<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Timothy Post.com - Latest Comments in Pleasantly Surprised</title><link>http://timothypost.disqus.com/</link><description>A blog by a native Bostonian who is living, working, and enjoying life in Krasnodar, Russia</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 11:31:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Pleasantly Surprised</title><link>http://www.timothypost.com/2008/05/12/pleasantly-surprised/#comment-1080227</link><description>Great analysis.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Russia cruise</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 11:31:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pleasantly Surprised</title><link>http://www.timothypost.com/2008/05/12/pleasantly-surprised/#comment-930764</link><description>Mostly agreed, except for two points:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. The most eye-catching remark in Putin’s speech was clearly his promise to reduce the tax burden on the oil sector ‘to encourage oil production’.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oil production decline is not a major issue at a time when the world has passed its oil peak and prices continue to rise fast. In fact if anything it would be a better idea to increase taxes even further so as to slow down extraction rates so as to get a better hand in the future. In any case a much more agreeable use of such a tax cut would be to subsidize wind, solar and nuclear power so as to leave over more oil for export purposes and contribute to developing a modern green economy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. "Making the (large) assumption that the worst is over in global credit"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That is indeed a very large and IMO flawed assumption.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Da Russophile</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 07:05:57 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>