Timothy Post.com - Latest Comments

Re: Keep Walking…..

facebook-702691834 — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 05:09:33 -0000

We have all been amused about the 18 liters/year/capita factoid. My friends at home are all shocked at this level of consumption. Every single expat friend who lives or has lived here has just shrugged and replied, "Meh."

I can't do anywhere near 1000 g in a night. But I can drink 300 maybe. A little or if I am mixing it with tonic (sacrilege, I know) . . .

Re: Keep Walking…..

thedailyreviewer — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:35:14 -0000

Hi!

Congratulations! Your readers have submitted and voted for your blog at The Daily Reviewer. We compiled an exclusive list of the Top 100 Russia Blogs, and we are glad to let you know that your blog was included! You can see it at http://thedailyreviewer.com/top/russia

You can claim your Top 100 Blogs Award here : http://thedailyreviewer.com/pages/badges/russia

P.S. This is a one-time notice to let you know your blog was included in one of our Top 100 Blog categories. You might get notices if you are listed in two or more categories.

P.P.S. If for some reason you want your blog removed from our list, just send an email to angelina@thedailyreviewer.com with the subject line "REMOVE" and the link to your blog in the body of the message.

Cheers!

Angelina Mizaki
Selection Committee President
The Daily Reviewer
http://thedailyreviewer.com

Re: Victoria Cup Ice Hockey Championship

nhljerseys — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:48:30 -0000

Yet again, the north americans are so insular. Their 'World' Series of baseball always makes me chuckle!

Re: I Want a Twitter Domain .twt

kovshenin — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:46:06 -0000

Hey Tim, great thoughts on the .twt domain, I like it, but it's all up to the Twitter client software to decide what has to live and what has to die. You know I've been experimenting with short links lately and I wrote a plugin for WordPress which is doing quite good - Twitter Friendly Links. All your posts, no matter how long the permalink is, get shortlinks like yourdomain.com/7x1 or whatever. I've been using it for quite some time now on my own blog, but people are used to copying the link from their browser, into their twitter client (seesmic, tweetdeck or whatever) which is automatically shortened via bil.ly.

There's some microformats stuff going on with these shortlinks (the shortlink meta tag) but none of the Twitter client software work with those. It seems that there's not enough technical detail on what they have to do, and not enough software to gently handle the redirects with the proper headers and blah blah blah.

WordPress.com users recently got http://wp.me shortened links for each of their blog posts. It's nice to see that at least they care. Nevertheless people still post their username.wordpress.com/long-post-name-blah-blah on Twitter =)

RIP tr.im, I never liked you :-P

~ @kovshenin

Re: I Want a Twitter Domain .twt

timoreitnauer — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:04:07 -0000

Interesting thoughts and I think you're spot on. It's exactly the vision of our domain management service iWantMyName. Earlier this year we've launched "Domains For Apps" that lets you easily configure domains for popular web apps and services such as Google Apps, Zoho Business, Tumblr, Posterous, Squarespace, Moonfruit and many others.

We also wrote about the issue with URL shorteners in a blog article earlier this week and list as well hosted services as self-hosted options to run an URL shortener on your own domain:

http://iwantmyname.com/blog/2009/08/10-tools-to...

Re: I Want a Twitter Domain .twt

postzavtra — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:04:55 -0000

Henri, I'd love to chat with you about OAuth and .tel. Drop me a direct message at Twitter and let me know when's the best time to reach you.

Re: I Want a Twitter Domain .twt

twitter-6959952 — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 06:40:41 -0000

Hi Timothy,
I really like the way you're going with the OAuth thinking. Let's discuss OAuth options beyond 3rd-party app authentication when you've got time. There are a few .tel features you're missing that could make the opportunity even more interesting. I'm of course at henri.tel...

Speaking of Card.ly, it's a web-based service that displays your contact info. It's got a nice UI but doesn't solve the problems of speed of access (http is slow), consistency (what if they change their html?), resilience (centralized web service) and persistence (what if Card.ly goes under?).

Re: I Want a Twitter Domain .twt

postzavtra — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:20:01 -0000

Andy:

While I am most certainly a "layman" when it comes to understanding domains, DNS, top level domains, etc., I can give some perspective from the average "power user's" viewpoint.

Couple thoughts:

1. Are you aware of Card.ly? It's an analogous service which let's users aggregate their personal information, web affiliations, and contact info in one place. They're using the "freeium" model. You can host your profile as on card.ly top level domain for free. For $25 a year a user can host their profile on their own domain and they have access to "premium" skins.

The option to skin your profile (you can customize it with your own CSS) is a very powerful selling point, imo. I would like to see .tel offer, if it doesn't already, the option of skinning one's profile. As we have seen with Wordpress and Rapidweaver, such an option encourages 3rd party developers to quickly offer the public a lot of great options.

What I don't know for sure is whether you can create a CNAME so that you could create a sub-domain that points to your card.ly profile. I assume its possible but I'm not sure.

2. I would argue that OpenID delegation should be the #1 on the .tel roadmap. Currently, there is a huge opportunity for an OpenID provider to offer DNS verification for sub-domains. The mistake that the current group of OpenID Providers are making is that they view OpenID as an opportunity to drive traffic to their own domains and they hope to monetize that traffic in the future.

Therefore, they have all made the classic mistake of trying to "tie down" people's account to their own domains. While they all say that you can create an OpenID domain on one which you already own, I have not seen how this is possible and trust me, I have looked long and hard.

Basically, these guys don't get the new "open web" and they are basically cutting off their noses to spite their faces.

Almost all the attention of OpenID has been focused on the universal login capability. That's a mistake. Google and Facebook has effectively killed OpenID's universal login growth by offering the same service for their users.

Therefore, telnic should seize the opportunity to become an OpenID Provider itself and enable folks to create their "social web hub" on their own .tel domains. This window of opportunity will probably close, in my opinion, shortly as Google "marries Google Apps, Google Profile, and Google Connect.

The key take-away from the OpenID environment is that people "in the know" do not want to be beholden to a web service, as Robert Scoble detailed with tr.im The other point is that people primary domain is not a good location for their social web hub because in most cases that domain is already being used for other purposes (e.g blog, website, etc.).

Telnic is uniquely positioned because it is already offering folks a top level domain as their social web hub. People will, I suspect, not be opposed to having a .com (or whatever top level domain) for their main website and a .tel top level domain for their single point of contact.

What .tel, imho, should focus on is not redirecting the primary .tel domain to external URLs but rather, redirecting people's .tel sub-domain to external URLs. This solution, of leaving the users primary .tel domain (say http://bobsmith.tel) alone and only letting users redirect SUB-DOMAINS would therefore, mean that you would not "lose the predictability of the HTTP TelProxy always returning a uniform representation of records."

I should note that currently I know of only a couple web services who offer this option of redirect and masking. Wordpress.com, Squarespace, and Google Apps. I have to admit that I was frankly very surprised that Facebook didn't offer this option to its users. The current FB username option is still weak because your username lives on FB's domain.

Facebook should have given people the option of redirecting and masking either their primary domain (i.e. timothypost.com) or a sub-domain (facebook.timothypost.com).

If Telnic moves quickly and smartly it could partner with dozens and dozens of web services to offer sub-domain redirects to the user account pages and masking with the user's own domain.

Ultimately, I think we will begin to see a service like Google Apps but for many, many web services. I have set-up my Google Apps account so that I can access my email account at http://email.timothypost.com, my calendar at http://calendar.timothypost.com, etc.

I want to do this for ALL my web services. One twist would be for me, the user, to name the sub-domain for the service, not the company providing the service. For instance, instead of http://linkedin.timothypost.com, I would name this sub-domain http://resume.timothypost.com. This would give me, the user, ultimate flexibility if, in the future, another better "resume" service came around.

Telnic could start by offering its users the option of redirecting only. It's my understanding that to truly mask the external URL one needs the cooperation of that company. Telnic could promote its developer API so new web services, say competing with LinkedIn, would offer masking as a competitive advantage.

This sub-domain redirect and masking topic is very important for two reasons:

1. User fatigue. One of the biggest hurdles facing web servcies today is that users are absolutely sick and tired of creating new accounts and then having to, once again, fill in their data.

Telnic could be the central place for people to enter all their personal, work, hobby, interests, etc. information with industry standardized Fields and when a user linked their .tel account with a new web service it would auto populate that information. People could "curate" their information at their .tel account accounts instead of in 37 different places.

A new technology from Google Pub Sub Hubbub would mean that when folks update their information at .tel it would immediately disseminate to their other accounts.

2. "Walled Gardens" not only are people sick of having to reenter data over and over but they are frustrated when that data is hard to export out of a web service. This solution with .tel would solve this issue because people's data would live in their .tel accounts.

This point raises another pertinent topic of today, namely where people's data is stored. This point was also raised in Robert Scoble's blog post.

Ideally, what I would love to see .tel do is a partnership with one of the companies offering a front-end interface to Amazon's S3 storage. In a perfect world, I would upload files, photos, etc. into my .tel account account and they would be stored at Amazon S3. Then, when I sign-up for a web service, such as Flickr.com, the web service company would access them at my S3 server. I already serve some photos to my blog using the S3 "Copy Path" option.

Obviously, many users would not want this option because they would have to pay for the storage. Nonetheless, Telnic should be offering this service to its power users who are also the thought leaders on the internet. Guys like Dave Winer would love this option and so would many corporations and organizations.

Telnic could actually create a revenue stream by doing a partnerhsip agreement with Amazon where it gets a commission for folks who access S3 storage through through .tel accounts.

Here's the URL for the su.pr set-up instructions for custom domains:

http://www.stumbleupon.com/developers/Supr:Shor...

I have a suspicion that su.pr may be saving the custom domain short URL to ALL external URLs as a paid premium offering. They are not saying yet but in their Help Forums there's been some speculation able this possiblity.

So, to wrap up, I am excited for .tel and the possibilities before it to truly reshape the web and to give the power back to the people.

PS: I'm curious, I left Network Solutions and shifted all my domains over to GoDaddy but I read that GoDaddy is not one of the registrars able to offer .tel. Do you have any idea on why that is so. I would think that .tel would want to establish itself as the ultimate personal domain and thus, GoDaddy scale and reach would be very important?

Great to chat with you. I have been meaning to put my thoughts down as a blog post and thanks to you, I've just done that.

Re: I Want a Twitter Domain .twt

twitter-14902465 — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:27:31 -0000

OpenID delegation is somewhere on the roadmap for .tel.

Currently you can't redirect .tel CNAME's to external URLs, but it might be a feature worth considering. The problem is that we'd lose the predictability of the HTTP TelProxy always returning a uniform representation of records.

How does the su.pr service work? Do you have some kind of rewrite rule that forwards requests to the su.pr server, or did they provide you with a standalone script to use on your server? In any case I can't see any technical reason why its target URLs should be restricted to your domain.

Re: I Want a Twitter Domain .twt

postzavtra — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:50:31 -0000

Andy, Thanks for the comment.

I'm not necessarily "married" to the .tel doman itself. Rather, what I'd like to see is that web users have the opportunity to connect a domain, which they own to the various web services.

For example, I would much rather have the opportunity to create a CNAME for my Facebook account so that my account at FB could be accessed at http://facebook.timothypost rather than at http://facebook.com/timothypost.

I have written in the past about OpenID and how it's my opinion that the service will realy catch fire when OpenID Providers offers users the opportunity to create a sub-domain for their central OpenID social hub, as well as, use that sub-domain for their universal login.

I thought of the .tel domain because it does seek to be a domain, which people can use as their central web hub and, I believe, it offers some additional add-on features.

Regarding short URLs, I should point-out that su.pr (StumbleUpon's entrant in the short URL world) has enabled a feature, which enables users to create a short URL using their websites domain for links that point to that website, itself.

What this means is that instead on me pasting:

http://www.timothypost.com/2009/08/10/i-want-a-...

into Twitter, I could, with su.pr short URL service, paste something like:

htpp://timothypost.com/hsrn instead.

While this su.pr feature is nice it doesn't, imo, go far enough. I would like to see su.pr enable users to shorten ANY website's URL with their own domain.

Do you know of any technical issues, which would make this new "custom" short URL impossible?

Re: I Want a Twitter Domain .twt

twitter-14902465 — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:56:32 -0000

Using .tel domains for URL shortening could be an interesting solution, but I'm not sure it's such a good idea. .tel's purpose is to disseminate contact information through the DNS. Do short URL hacks really fit sit well with this objective, or would it just be a distraction? I'm not sure.

On the other hand, it could boost .tel adoption, which would be a good thing :)

Re: I Want a Twitter Domain .twt

twitter-14902465 — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:47:44 -0000

Re: It’s Su.pr to be Short

SharoHill — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 15:29:21 -0000

I have already used Su.pr and liked the features. I mostly use it for promoting my blogs; otherwise for simple need of shortening URLs, I use http://aafter.com/. It’s free and fail-safe.

Sharon

Re: About Me

postzavtra — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:14:54 -0000

Andrewa:

Please feel free to contact me directly by Skype or email and I'd be glad to help you evaluate job opportunities here in Krasnodar Krai.

Bottom-line is that the jobs for expats will be down in Krasnaya Polyana and Rosa Khutor over the next couple of years before the Olympics start. There is no comparison between St. Petersburg and Krasnodar Krai. Krasnodar Krai is to St. Pete as San Diego is to Chicago. Different "animals' completely.

Anyhow, I look forward to speaking with you.

Re: New Project: Russian Riviera Today

kovshenin — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:54:53 -0000

Hey thanks for the shoutout Tim and tonnes of luck with the project. Hope it goes well!

Re: About Me

andrewa — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:59:39 -0000

I was considering moving to the Krasnodar area. I have previously lived in Russia and thought it would be a great place to live. Are there many job opportunities for Americans there? I lived in Pete before how does it compare? I currently live in West Jordan, Utah. Thanks for any help.
Andrew

Re: List of Krasnodar, Russia Hotels

vetoc — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:11:50 -0000

Hotel Baoli

Krasnodar, 7, Sormovskay St

Tel: 279-61-07,279-61-04

www.baoli.su

Re: Maria Rafaela Taxi

jenicar730 — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:03:38 -0000

A Mercedes for a taxi. I like it. Its great that Mercedes motors allowed this minivan to be a taxi.

Re: Krasnodar Discovers Golf

golf — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:02:00 -0000

I am actually coming to Krasnodar in a month or two, it will sure be a good time there, 300 rubies for one full bucket of balls seems to be a fare deal! thanks.

Re: Kamelia Hotel to become Saraya Sochi Resort

alfonsobergami — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 07:24:48 -0000

Sounds very interesting. Great time to invest for 2014 Olympic Winter Games

Re: I Grocked openid Today on Mahalo Answers

gkrall — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:41:23 -0000

Tim: You raised a number of items let me see if I can offer some feedback.

1) "(I use this term specifically because you do charge for add-on services to your PIP program) " Actually we don't charge anything for our service.

2) "to create a sub-domain with openID as the prefix associated with a root domain of my choosing." I believe that "bigdave" pointed you to a better reference link on how you could do this with the PIP.

3) "I just checked-out FAQ #17 and I think you guys could make it much clearer. The FAQ assumes one already understand OpenID Delegation." This is a very valid point and we should probably include "bigdave's" suggested wiki link on the page for additional information.

4) "are attempts to use the OpenID universal identifier login to establish a social aggregator service, like friendfeed, lifestream, etc." Clearly there is an opportunity to, as you point out, aggregate information around a identifier and since OpenID's happen to be url based and as you pointed out could be unique domain names there is a potential for aggregating information that is managed by the user - not necessarily a replacement to social aggregators that provide "activity stream" data but rather one which is actually managed by the user. You are right we're not interested in competing with friendfeed but we are interested in providing a service that allows users to manage their profile information and aggregation of other types of data - potentially around their domain name.

5) Your commentary with regards to vanity domains is something that we actually have in place - although not well promoted. As you may know Verisign recently acquired "Global Name Registry" (GNR) who were the organization responsible for the dotName TLD. GNR had developed a service at "Freeyouid.com" which essentially allows a user to register a domain name while at the same time register an account on the PIP such that timothy.post.name becomes your openid identifier. GNR in promotion of their TLD were very focused on the concept of sub-domains to identify specific services as in your example so this is a concept that could get further hearing as we progress. The bottom line is that what you are looking for I think is on the path to happening but in the dotName name space and not in dotCom.

Thanks!

Re: I Grocked openid Today on Mahalo Answers

postzavtra — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 10:09:51 -0000

@BigDaveDiode Thanks for pointing me to the Delegation page.

Question: Can Delegation be done on a sub-domain specifically, not just the root domain?

If so, can Delegation use the DNS Verification method INSTEAD of embedding the HTML code into the head section of an html page attached to the sub-domain. The reason I ask is because if my sub-domain already has a webpage associated with it then I will NOT be able to use that sub-domain as a Domain Mask at a web 2.0 social aggregator of my choice.

I just checked-out the wikipedia page for sub-domains. It is really very interesting. Here's the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subdomain

Re: I Grocked openid Today on Mahalo Answers

postzavtra — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:55:45 -0000

@gkrall Thanks for the comment. Fair enough. I did not notice that Verisign enables customers to use their own root domains as openID identifiers through the Verification process known as "delegation."

While that is a good intermediate step, I believe Verisign could gain a real competitive advantage over the Providers by enabling its openID "customers" (I use this term specifically because you do charge for add-on services to your PIP program) to create a sub-domain with openID as the prefix associated with a root domain of my choosing.

I just checked-out FAQ #17 and I think you guys could make it much clearer. The FAQ assumes one already understand OpenID Delegation.

You guys were actually my first choice as I begain this process because you have established a rock solid reputation as a SSL Certificate provider. Verisign is a trusted internet brand name.

I would, however, humble suggest that you guys are missing a huge opportunity to really gain significant marketshare in the OpenID provider marketplace as a result of your PIP program. The PIP program is such an alluring prize for OpenID Providers. Essentially, your PIP program, or claimID's user page, or MyOpenID's user identity page are attempts to use the OpenID universal identifier login to establish a social aggregator service, like friendfeed, lifestream, etc.

This is a mistake, IMHO. Verisgin will never beat Friendfeed. Seriously. So why pollute your brand by trying to be something which you guys are not.

The beauty of Verisign is that you are ALREADY a huge domain registrar. I hadn't realized this fact until 5 minutes ago. So everything I wrote about the opportunity for GoDaddy applies to you guys as well.

You guys should offer OpenID registration as part of your regular domain registration service. You could easily enable DNS Verification. This is a key point. Delegation Verification requires that a domain already have an html page into which the embed code can be copied. This defeats the whole point of registering a sub-domain as your OpenID identifier to begin with.

What you guys want is for every Tom, Dick, and Sally who already uses Friendfeed to come to you to buy their "vanity domain" once Friendfeed allows their uses to "mask" their account URLs with their "vanity" URLs.

Sub-domains SHOULD be a huge growth area for your registrar division. As I mentioned above, I set-up some sub-domains on my own (http://twitter.timothypost.com). Every Web 2.0 service should be offering to let people set-up custom sub-domains. When they do, as Wordpress.com, already does, you guys will benefit.

Update after doing a little more digging: The key value-add for Verisign in the use of sub-domain as user account "masks" is that you will have already verified legitamite domain ownership as a result of the OpenID verification. All the Web 2.0 companies can outsource all the domain ownership verification work to Verisign and Verisign can offer a badge which declares the this sub-domain is legit.

Additionally, Verisign could become the full-service outsourced solution for web 2.0 companies that want to offer their users the option of using custom masked domains of their choosing. Wordpress and Google do it themselves but many other companies would probably prefer to outsource this program to Verisign. New revenue stream.

Lastly, Verisign registrar group could work with the openID group to develop a user dashboard to manage their custom sub-domains. I would switch from Godaddy in a minute it Verisign offered me the ability the seamlessly and intuitively create custom sub-domains and mange them without having to worry if I'm screwing up the DNS info.

Re: I Grocked openid Today on Mahalo Answers

BigDaveDiode — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:04:08 -0000

You can use http://openid.timothypost.com as your OpenID identifier with ANY OpenID provider by setting up delegation. There is great explanation and an example of how to do this at http://wiki2008.openid.net/Delegation.

Re: I Grocked openid Today on Mahalo Answers

jasoncalacanis — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:19:27 -0000

Thanks for taking the time to share your experiences with Mahalo Answers..... the product is very new and we're still getting our legs under us, but out of the gate it is much better than any other Q&A site out there so we're very hopeful that the experience will get even better.

The concept behind Mahalo is that it will blend three types of services:

1. search
2. content
3. knowledge exchange (i.e. a Q&A service).

If you look at this "guide page" at Mahalo on OpenID it is starting to fill out:
http://www.mahalo.com/Openid

You question is now part of the opus, and one of our Guides is updating that page now thanks to it. The Q&A drives our content, our content drives our Q&A--and the hand selected links are icing on the cake.

Your question was a free question, so it is going to get about 25-50% as much attention than if you put M$1 on it. (one mahalo dollar). I'm guessing it would have been 2-10x better if you gave a tip.

What is your member page/member name? i'm going to put M$5 in your account so you can try some other questions with a tip.

Thanks again,

Jason McCabe Calacanis